Lutheran Theology

What makes a faithful sermon?

by jpserrano on January 5, 2012 · 0 comments

20120105-003035.jpg

Preaching is a form of communication where it is difficult for the preacher to utilize any feedback given from the congregation. With a single sermon there are as many opinions as there are listeners-sometimes more!

With my own sermons, I realize that not every one is going to be a home run. But often, when I think one is terrible, someone will inevitably tell me how they experienced renewed faith though it.

In seminary I was taught by Dr. Clay Scmit the 5 things that make a faithful sermon. I try to keep these in mind while I am thinking, writing, practicing, re-writing, and further practicing the sermon. These points help me craft a faithful sermon.

A sermon should:

  1. Be faithful to the text: A sermon should come from the Bible. It shouldn’t come from the latest theological book, the church’s confessions, or whatever happens to be on the preachers mind. The primary source for faithful preaching is the scriptures, a preacher should be deeply engaged with the written Word.
  2. Be faithful to the context: A sermon is for a specific time and place. A preacher should know the people in the congregation well enough that the sermon speaks to them specifically. A sermon given in an urban nursing home will be different than one give in a suburban church service–even if the scripture used is exactly the same. This is why no preacher should ever take whole sermons from the internet-they are not written for your congregation.
  3. Faithful in Theology: A sermon should not stray from the theological history of a specific theological tradition. This means that a sermon on the Eucharist is going to be different in a Lutheran church then it would be in a Nazarene church. Additionally, the sermon should always tell some part of the Good News God’s grace in Jesus Christ.
  4. Touch the mind: A sermon should be clear and logical. It should cause the listener to think more about the scripture, God, and life or inspire points of further reflection.
  5. Touch the heart: A sermon should not bore the listener. A faithful sermon is crafted like a piece of art that engages the hearer through the use of effective communication techniques-stories, repetition, eye contact, appropriate gestures, repetition. It should be “entertaining.” (I know some people will have a problem with my use of this word).

Though I’m mindful of these points, a sermon is more like art then assembly; just because I know them doesn’t make the writing any easier.

I have thought for many years about what I would add to this list. But every time I come up with something, I realize that it falls under one of the above categories.

I find what I have learned here is substantive and worthy of use and further reflection.

Is there anything you would add to this list?

-jpserrano

It wasn’t until I picked up one of his books that I realized he wrote this stuff down. If you are interest in reading the book where he wrote these points down and elaborates on them I recommend Sent and Gathered: A Worship Manual for the Missional Church (Engaging Worship) along with any of his other works.

You can find them here:

{ 0 comments }

At PLTS, a popular phrase quoted is two words from Martin Luther.  Students will triumphantly announce something like, “Well, Luther tells us to SIN BOLDLY.”

It seems it is more often than not used as an excuse to allow sins (not Sin) to continue in the life of the believer.  It has become a license to allow breaking the commandments–behaviors that transgress the way God would have us live as members of the Kingdom of God here and now.

It also appears that the whole sentence where those two words came from has been lost.  The phrase is taken out of context, much like the verse from the Bible I see in a lot of church kitchens “Eat, drink, and be merry . . . (for tomorrow we die.”). I think most may not even realize where it comes from.

Here is Luther’s full letter to Melanchthon, with the oft-used quote in it’s original context:

“If you are a preacher of mercy, do not preach an imaginary but the true mercy. If the mercy is true, you must therefore bear the true, not an imaginary sin. God does not save those who are only imaginary sinners. Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong (sin boldly), but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world. We will commit sins while we are here, for this life is not a place where justice resides. We, however, says Peter (2 Peter 3:13) are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth where justice will reign. It suffices that through God’s glory we have recognized the Lamb who takes away the sin of the world. No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day. Do you think such an exalted Lamb paid merely a small price with a meager sacrifice for our sins? Pray hard for you are quite a sinner.”

So then, this whole letter is doing several things.  First, it is an indictment of who we are.  Luther is clearly saying to Melanchthon that we (people) are sinners and because of our fallenness, we will continue to sin until the second coming.  I believe that Luther is using a hyperbole here in order for us to understand exactly who we are.  Our sins are real; they are not unimportant nor minimal…they do matter. Luther is trying to tell those people who think they are pretty good, except for those little sins here or there, that they are in fact really big sinners and should see themselves as big sinners.  Hence why he says, “be a sinner.”  What I hear in this is an admonition for me to own the state I am in now and a recognition that I am not a saint on my own.  Nowhere in here do I hear Luther giving permission to sin–which is the way I hear the quote often used.

Secondly, we need to own our sin and understand it to be real, in order for grace to be real.  If we have fake sin, then we don’t need grace.  If our sin, however, is real, then we in fact need a grace that is real.  What I hear in this is more about God’s grace to forgive and continually seek me out rather than doing whatever I want (or as it is more popularly summarized: SINNING BOLDLY!)

Lastly, what is missed in not quoting the whole phrase Luther uses is the admonition to let our trust in Christ be stronger than the sins we commit.  Luther is telling Melanchthon (and us) that our trust in Christ is of first importance.  It is to be stronger than our sin, and it is to cause us to rejoice in victory.  This is important because I often I hear a defeatism in Lutheranism that keeps continually reminding people that we are sinners (which we are), but doesn’t in the same breath remind us that we are in fact freed from sin in Christ whom overcame.

So what we can get with the Sin Boldly mentality is a ho-hum approach that mimics the affect of Eeyore from Winnie the Pooh, (read in an Eeyore voice) “We all sin. Nothin’ we can do about it. Might as well not even try.”  But, we should take instead for the affect of Paul who said both, “I do not understand what I do for I do not do what I want to do but what I hate to do…it is not I that lives, but the sin that lives in me” (Rom 7:15-17) and ” I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me” (Gal 2:20).  We as Lutherans concentrate on Romans and not Galatians.  This is unhealthy, unscriptural, and unhelpful in living the Good News in the world.

So then, as Lutherans, let us only quote the whole phrase now and use it in context to show that we are dependent on Christ.  Let us never use it again to try to prove that sinning is acceptable and endorsed by God.  The reason God forgives our sins is because we did something wrong.  If there was no wrong-doing, then no forgiveness is needed.  Sin Boldly is in fact not a freedom to flagrantly sin, but to wholly depend on Christ when we do sin.

-jpserrano

{ 2 comments }

Clergy & Laity (The False Dichotomy Of Specialness)

I often hear in Lutheran circles (ELCA) a division between laity and clergy that is completely unhelpful. What I find particularly troubling is the degree to which some exalt clergy to such a point that the Pastor’s vary nature changed–somehow by the laying on of hands the person is now elevated and special in ordination. [...]

1 comment Read the full article → October 10, 2011