Spirituality

The “Work” of Lutheran Spirituality

by jpserrano on January 23, 2012 · 2 comments

Within Christianity I have learned that there are three realms to spirituality.

  1. Our connection to God.
  2. Our connection to others.
  3. Our connection to ourselves.

If we only have one or two of the three, our spirituality is missing something.  This article is primarily about the first realm.

Recently, I have come across several people who identify themselves as “spiritual.”  However, when prompted further, they couldn’t identity what makes them so.  I understand that within various religions and traditions spirituality looks different. However, in no tradition, including Christianity,  is spirituality actionless.

Just as we work on our self-understanding, relationships with our spouse, children, friends, our relationship with God takes work as well (most Lutherans I know have a stuttering “b b b-but” in their head right now. Put that aside. Keep reading).

A person who is “spiritual” with no practices has good intentions, but they are not “spiritual.”

My main point is this–spirituality takes work  (If you are uncomfortable with the word “work” think “cultivation” ).

As Lutherans, or Christians in general, the way we work on our spirituality is not through some practices we created.  The practices we participate in are created by God and in them God comes to us. Some people think “if” “then” here, but I don’t like that vending machine imagery, instead I think in these terms–God promises to come to us in specific ways.

God promises to come to us in our baptism.
God promises to come to us in communion.
God promises to come to us in worship.
God promises to come to us in the rightly preached Word.

If one is Lutheran and “spiritual” these are the absolute bare minimums of participation (Goodness, I hate putting it in those terms).

Moreover, we who do these practices recognize that the “work” we are doing isn’t actually our work but God’s.

In addition to the list above there is a host of ways that God comes to us (Lutheran Christians tend to neglect these).

  1. Daily devotional Bible reading.
  2. Private Prayer (fixed hour prayer, Jesus prayer, etc.)
  3. Journaling
  4. Lectio Divina
  5. Meditation

I often find that my  spiritual compass goes eschew and needs to be made true.  When I am involved in regular Bible reading, prayer etc. I am able to identify earlier that my spiritual compass is off and am able to connect again to Jesus who rights it again (not a perfect metaphor, but you get the idea).

Regular practice of the spiritual disciples is how we work on (cultivate) our spiritual life.  They are the means that God uses to come to us and should not be neglected.  When I hear Lutherans ask how to be more spiritual, I often wonder if they are regularly practicing the ancient practices of the faith.

Working on my spirituality through the spiritual disciplines has lead me to understand that it really isn’t me working.  I am responding to the gentle whisper of the Holy Spirit.  I am doing the “work” that I am called to do by slowing down enough to connect to God.  The work in the disciplines is all God’s.

Last tangetial thought: I find that the disciplines are a burden only when I am not practicing them.  They haunt me, calling me back to connection again.

So, how do you practice your spirituality?

-jpserrano

 

{ 2 comments }

Liberal Legalism

by jpserrano on January 2, 2012 · 0 comments

On this New Year’s day I only have one thing on my mind.  I admit it’s kind of random for the first post of the year–legalism.  I have been kicking this idea around in my head so I decided to write on it.

If your looking for definitions on legalism you can find it here, here, and here, so I won’t offer a definition beyond these.

I became very familiar with legalism when I attended a non-denominational church in San Diego.  The kind of legalism manifested there was of the conservative variety.  This legalism took the form best described in a saying, “Don’t drink, smoke, chew or date girls that do.”

But what I’ve encountered recently is a legalism that I had not expected.  I’m calling it- liberal legalism.

When I came up to Berkeley I experienced something similar to the above with different moral, theological, political stances and actions.  One can guess from the location what those stances are.  Instead, I have seen here not a questioning of ones salvation, which happens all the time in conservative legalism, but a backhanded self-aggrandizement and pity for those who don’t hold similar views.

It comes very slyly: perhaps Prius owners who look at others as not as evolved as themselves and their care for the earth.  Maybe it’s thinking that someone’s Christianity is faulty if they aren’t marching against the “imperialism of the United States.”  Often it comes in theological forms….basically with any hot button issue.

It is a belief that states that if the “other” (though they hate using this term, they utilize the mentality frequently) does not agree with the belief holder, then their Christianity is antiquated.

Liberal legalism is guilty of the exact same mentality as conservative legalism.  They both have the same attitude.

What both sides need to realize is that legalism of both types does not serve the faith Jesus taught.  It moves away from the salvific message of Jesus in freeing humanity from sin, death, and bondage and moves the message to one’s right actions.  It moves the location of grace from God to the person.

What both sides need to do is enter into real conversation with the other side and walk with one another in love.

What do you think?  Is there a liberal legalism?

-jpserrano

If you looking for a good book check out Beyond Liberalism and Fundamentalism: How Modern and Postmodern Philosophy Set the Theological Agenda (Rockwell Lecture)

{ 0 comments }

The First Traveller

I am a British Christian.  My family were Christians when Ireland was still in pagan darkness. I belong  to the ancient church of this land.  I didn’t like the thought of this Irish missionary upstart.  I thought he was a puppet of the  English king, whom I hate. When I saw him coming down the lane I would have [...]

0 comments Read the full article → September 5, 2008